Thesaurus: enthymeme
An argument consisting of only two propositions, an antecedent and consequent deduced from it; a syllogism with one premise omitted; as, We are dependent; therefore we should be humble. Here the major proposition is supp…
Related headwords
humbledefinitiondependentdefinitionsyllogismdefinitionthereforedefinitioncreaturesdefinitionargumentdefinitioncompletedefinitionconsequentdefinitionconsistingdefinitiondeduceddefinitionheredefinitionomitteddefinitionpremisedefinitionpropositionsdefinitionsuppresseddefinitionantecedentdefinitionmajordefinitionpropositiondefinitionenthymematicfamilyenthymematicalfamilyenthymemesfamilyenthusiasmneighborenthusiasmsneighborenthusiastneighborenthusiasticneighborenthusiasticalneighborenthusiasticallyneighborenthusiastsneighbor
Definitions
- n. An argument consisting of only two propositions, an antecedent and consequent deduced from it; a syllogism with one premise omitted; as, We are dependent; therefore we should be humble. Here the major proposition is suppressed. The complete syllogism would be, Dependent creatures should be humble; we are dependent creatures; therefore we should be humble.
- An argument consisting of only two propositions, an antecedent and consequent deduced from it; a syllogism with one premise omitted; as, We are dependent; therefore we should be humble. Here the major proposition is suppressed. The complete syllogism would be, Dependent creatures should be humble; we are dependent creatures; therefore we should be humble.
- An argument consisting of only two propositions, an antecedentand consequent deduced from it; a syllogism with one premise omitted;as, We are dependent; therefore we should be humble. Here the majorproposition is suppressed. The complete syllogism would be, Dependentcreatures should be humble; we are dependent creatures; therefore weshould be humble.
- n. An argument consisting of only two propositions, an antecedent and consequent deduced from it; a syllogism with one premise omitted; as, We are dependent; therefore we should be humble. Here the major proposition is suppressed. The complete syllogism would be, Dependent creatures should be humble; we are dependent creatures; therefore we should be humble.